CS610 Research Methods - Measurement
Copyright 1995 Richard Halstead-Nussloch, Ph.D.
All Rights Reserved
Definition
To measure something is to assign numbers to represent the object or a property of the
object. Measurement is at the heart of science, and plays a central role in research. To
understand measurement requires an understanding of :
- Numbers
- Objects and properties
- The assignment of numbers to objects and their properties
Measurement is extremely important in computer science research, because it is so widely
applied, yet so often misunderstood.
Numbers
Since measurement is the assignment of numbers, one can learn much about measurement
by examining the structure of numbers. Three structural facts about numbers are
important:
- Order: Numbers are ordered.
- Distance: Differences between numbers are ordered, and can represent a distance
between two objects on a property.
- Origin: The series of numbers has a unique origin, represented by zero.
Objects and Properties
Without delving too deeply into philosophy, one "knows" an object by its properties. An
unpeeled orange is known by its spherical shape, orange color, dimpled skin texture, etc.
In measurement, one assigns a number to a property of an object. Objects can then be
distinguished and sometimes compared by those numbers, which represent the measure of
that property. Of course, multiple properties can be measured and used to distinguish and
compare objects in a multidimensional fashion. In research, one often measures multiple
instances of an object for statistical purposes.
The Assignment of Numbers to Objects and Their Properties
Torgerson [TORG58] discusses the process of measurement. In his discussion, I see a
practical value of measurement in computer science research: for some, but not
necessarily all properties, it is possible to give empirical meaning to none, one, two, or
sometimes all three of the characteristics of numbers listed above. The assignment of
numbers to objects and their properties, the actual process of measurement, thus
determines whether the numbers actually have the empirical meaning or not.
Torgerson goes on to discuss that the three characteristics of numbers give rise to two
different ways to distinguish among different kinds of measurement:
- Types of scales
- Kinds of measurement
As one takes measurements, i.e., makes assignment of numbers to objects and their
properties, both the type of scales and kinds of measurements must be taken into account.
Types of Scales
Scientists, philosophers, mathematicians, etc. have provided a wide diversity of options for
the types of scales to be used in measurement. A scale is a mapping between numbers and
a property of an object or a set of objects possessing that property. According to
Torgerson, numbers are assigned to the objects so that the relations between the numbers
reflect the relations between the objects themselves with respect to the property. Types of
scales are most often distinguished by the relations between the numbers that are a
reasonably true reflection or representation of the relations between the objects on the
property measured. According to Stevens [STEV46], the
major types most often include:
Nominal Scale. Hays [HAYS63] describes a nominal or categorical scale as a rule for
arranging observations into equivalence classes, so that observations falling into the same
set are thought of as qualitatively the same and those in different classes as qualitatively
different in some respect. In general, each observation is placed in one and only one class,
making the classes mutually exclusive and exhaustive. The nominal or categorical scale
gives empirical meaning to none of the three characteristics of numbers described above as
important for measurement. Because it does not provide any empirical meaning to the
numbers, measurement purists, such as Torgerson, do not consider the nominal scale a
bona fide scale. Stevens, however, discusses a nominal scale with a basic
empirical operation of determining equality, and permissable statistics of
number of cases, mode, and contingency correlation.
An example nominal scale is the assignment of numbers to ball players.
Ordinal Scale. An ordinal scale is a rule for arranging observations into an order, that is,
ordering objects based on a common property. An example measurement is hardness.
The ordinal scale gives empirical meaning to one property of numbers--order. Although
numbers assigned in ordering the objects can be and are often manipulated by arithmetic,
the answer is not reliably interpretable as a meaningful statement about the objects or their
properties. Stevens includes the basic empirical operation of determination
of greater or less; he includes the median and percentiles as permissible
statistics.
Interval Scale. An interval scale is a rule for taking observations and measurements that
orders the objects on a common property and provides distances between two objects with
respect to their common property. For example temperature, which can be 40 degrees F
warmer at 2:00 PM than it was at 2:00 AM the night before. The interval scale gives
empirical meaning to two properties of numbers--order and distance. Numbers assigned
to objects through an interval scale can be manipulated by linear functions and still
preserve magnitudes and empirical interpretability. For example, one easily can move
between the Fahrenheit and Celsius scales of temperature.
Stevens includes determination of equality of intervals or differences as
the basic empirical operations for interval scales. His list of
permissible statistics includes the mean, standard deviation, and both the
rank-order and product-moment correlation.
Ratio Scale. A ratio scale is a rule for taking observations and measurements that orders
the objects on a common property, provides distances between two objects with respect to
their common property, and has a true zero point or origin. Length is an example of a
ratio scale. The ratio scale gives empirical meaning to all three of the characteristics of
numbers--order, distance, and origin. Any of the ordinary arithmetic operations can be
applied to differences between objects observed on a ratio scale, and the scale remains
meaningfully interpretable.
For example, if Sam buys 1 foot of bubble gum tape and Pat
buys 2 feet of bubble gum tape, the statement that Pat has twice as much gum (2 feet / 1
foot) is meaningful.
Stevens includes the determination of equality of ratios as the basic
empirical operation for a ratio scale; he lists the coefficient of variation
as the permissible statistic.
Kinds of Measurement
Torgerson distinguishes among three kinds of measurement by the kinds of information
the numbers represent. Any particular scale might involve any mixture of the following
three kinds of measurement:
- Derived measurements
- Fiat measurements
- Fundamental measurements
Derived measurements. Derived measurements obtain meaning through laws relating the
property to other properties. Density is an example in that it derives its meaning through
its relationship to volume and mass.
Fiat measurements. Fiat measurements obtain meaning simply by arbitrary definition.
The meaning depends on presumed, intuitive, or common-sense relationships between the
measured property and the target concept. Fiat measures are often called indicators.
Some examples include economic indicators, preference indicators, and complexity
indicators.
Fundamental measurements. Fundamental measurements assign numbers to objects
according to natural laws to represent the property. There is no presupposition that other
variables need to be measured. Examples include length, resistance, number, and volume.
Fundamental measurements are almost always directly interpretable with respect to
empirical meaning.
References
- [HAYS63]
- Hays, W.L.
Statistics. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston: New York, 1963.
- [STEV46]
- Stevens, S.S. On the Theory of Scales of Measurement.
Science. Vol 103, Number 2684, pages 677-680, 1946.
- [TORG58]
- Torgerson, W.L. Theory and methods of scaling.
John Wiley and Sons: New
York, 1958.
Bibliography
- [DOMI80]
- Dominowski, R.L. Research methods. Prentice Hall:
Englewood Cliffs, NJ,
1980.